Here is some information on Judge Schnall
Judge Schnall was in Goderich Court before moving south. While in the
Goderich courts, her judgments were know to be consistently bad. She favored
the CAS and presented anti-father and anti-family judgments.
Her judgments were so bad that receiving a bad judgments in the court from
her was know as "being Schnalled". The local Goderich lawyers were very
pleased to see her move to London. This comment was made to me by a crown
While in Goderich, during a case in which the CAS was sitting as an observer
and where Judge Schnall ruled that although the CAS had settled their
issues, the judge was retaining the CAS as part of the case, Judge Schnall
ejected Tony Vorsteveld, (Box 1231 Clinton, Ontario, N0M 1L0) a men's
advocate and the moderator of the local Clinton Men's advocacy group called
Balance Beam. She permitted a woman from the women's shelter in Goderich to
stay in the courtroom. Then, she ejected the lawyer, Phillip Cornish, 35
Ontario Street, Clinton 519-482-1434 from the courtroom as well. Judge
Schnall suggested in her ruling that lawyer Philip Cornish would not honor
his professional standards if he was in the court.
Judge Schnall is reported to have many complaints filed against her in the
judicial council. When thrown from the courtroom Phillip Cornish informed
Judge Schnall that he would be filing a complaint but I did not follow up on
Lawyer Phillip Cornish's complaint to see what resulted.
I have been told by 4 separate lawyers on 4 separate occasions that Judge
Schnall's rulings were improper and her bias was legendary in the Goderich
I see that Judge Schnall is ruling in the "spanking" case in St. Thomas.
This judge is very dangerous, especially in a closed court. Her judgments
support radical feminism and she appears to use her position to promote an
anti-father agenda. She should be disbarred and the courts must be opened to
the public and the press.
There is more damage to children through closed courts than would ever
happen if the community had access to the judge's decisions. Closed courts
smell of corruption. Judge Schnall has proven she is unjust.
I spoke by telephone to an acquaintance of Rev. Hildebrandt today. She
reported that Rev. Hildebrandt was charged with breaking the secrecy ruling
in the case by creating a web site. He was found not guilty by court, then
the judge created a ruling that denied Rev. Hildebrandt the freedom from
publishing the fact that he had been ruled innocent of the charge. Here
again is another judge who is clearly violating free speech and muzzling the
Rev.'s right to clear his name from false allegations.
Clearly the courts are being used to assault citizens without cause and the
court secrecy rulings are being used to shield the perpetrators of false
allegations and slander.