Family Aid

Our Vision

Appeal Aylmer Decision

Protect Your Family

Related Sites

Diagnosing CAS

Stop CAS Poll

Children's Aid

News, Scandals, Analysis

CAS Stories
Families Abused

News, History, Facts

Protest and Analysis

to MPPs and CAS officials

LFP: Agency evidence allowed in abuse court case

Date: OCT-12-02
Source: London Free Press
Keywords: constitutional rights, legal rationale
Posted: OCT-12-02
Aylmer Case Index

Saturday, October 12, 2002

Agency evidence allowed in abuse court case


Judge Eleanor Schnall will allow evidence collected by Family and Children Services to be used against a family with Aylmer's Church of God.

But in a ruling this week, Schnall omitted her reasons, reasons that could limit the way social workers investigate alleged abuse and neglect.

"My written reasons are not yet complete enough for release at this time," Schnall wrote in a one-page ruling.

Her ruling comes 15 months after social workers and police, confronted by church members, dragged seven children from their home as cameras clicked, the images broadcast across the continent.

The children's parents claimed the agency trampled their constitutional rights and asked Schnall to throw out evidence they used objects such as electrical cords and a fly-swatter to hit their children.

The children's lawyer agreed social workers infringed on constitutional rights, but argued the evidence should be admitted because the paramount interest was that of the children.

In her ruling, Schnall doesn't indicate if she agreed with the children's' lawyer or the social agency, which maintains its actions were justified.

Schnall wrote she would soon release her reasons.

"(The ruling) doesn't tell us very much . . . We'll just have to wait until she gives her reasons before commenting," church pastor Henry Hildebrandt said. Lawyers for the parents, children and the social agency couldn't be reached for comment yesterday.

The children were returned July 26, 2001, to their parents, who promised not to strike or medically neglect them until the matter was resolved.

The agency later decided to not seek custody, asking for a protective order that would allow it to monitor the family.

Church leaders claimed the social agency abridged their religious freedom -- this case was the second against a church family. When a third family was investigated, Aylmer churchgoers made a temporary exodus to a sister congregation in Indiana.

But the rights that took centre stage at trial were not religious, but those that safeguard criminal defendants, rights that dealt with issues like warrants and coerced statements.

Most of the trial was conducted behind a shroud of secrecy imposed by Schnall, whose publication ban was later overturned.

The Church of God encourages followers to use objects to discipline their children, and faith, not doctors, to heal. Their practices have been investigated in jurisdictions where children have died.

Aylmer Case Index

[Home] [Webmaster]